Lacomb v. Poland Central School District
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas Aloi, J.
Defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, in part, in Action No. 3, on the grounds that plaintiff Darlene T. Postiglion had not sustained a “serious injury” (Insurance Law, § 671, subd 4), and thus did not meet the threshold for suit under New York’s no-fault insurance statute. Plaintiffs’ answering affidavits were by plaintiffs’ attorney, who attached a copy of a report by a clinical psychologist. In the report, a diagnosis for “Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, *586Chronic (DSM III 309.81)” was made, and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hezekiah v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Sanders v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Daviero v. JohnsonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Ayala v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Needleman v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Granowitz v. VanvickleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Poblet v. ParisiNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Lysniak v. BoursiquotNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Hohlakis v. Raymond Rizzo AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 1995