Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. City of Searcy

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1940No. 4-5872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mehafey, J7f

E. N. Rand and others, as taxpayers, brought this suit in the White chancery court to enjoin the City of Searcy, its mayor and city council, from calling and holding’ an election and issuing- bonds under Amendment No. 13 to the 'Constitution. An ordinance had been adopted and an election called thereunder at the time the suit was filed.

The complaint alleged that the appellants were citizens and taxpayers and owned both real and personal property in the City of-Searcy; that the City of Searcy is a municipal corporation. The other' appellees named are the mayor and aldermen of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Town of Searcy v. YarnellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. Fussell-Graham-Alderson Co. v. Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Lester v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Town of Jacksonport v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
  5. Halbut v. Forrest CitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anonymous v. Superior Court in & for the County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Coleman v. Superior Court in & for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Wallenstein v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API