Legal Opinion

Vail v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1994No. Civ. No. 940132PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Viola Vail appealed from a district court judgment affirming an order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau denying her claim for continued payment of chiropractic treatments for a work-related injury. We conclude the Bureau’s finding that continued chiropractic treatments are neither reasonable nor medically necessary to treat Vail’s injury is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and we affirm.

During March 1982, Vail injured her back while employed as a housekeeper at St. Luke’s Hospital in Fargo. She filed a claim for workers compensation benefits, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Froysland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Caldis v. Board of County Commissioners, Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hayes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Moses v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Otto v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Claim of VailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ollom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API