Vail v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
Viola Vail appealed from a district court judgment affirming an order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau denying her claim for continued payment of chiropractic treatments for a work-related injury. We conclude the Bureau’s finding that continued chiropractic treatments are neither reasonable nor medically necessary to treat Vail’s injury is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, and we affirm.
During March 1982, Vail injured her back while employed as a housekeeper at St. Luke’s Hospital in Fargo. She filed a claim for workers compensation benefits, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Froysland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Caldis v. Board of County Commissioners, Grand Forks CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Hayes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Moses v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Otto v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Claim of VailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Ollom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995