Mineral Resources, Incorporated v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Chief Judge:
Petitioner Mineral Resources, Inc. (“MRI”) seeks review of an order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”), in which the Commission held that certain natural gas was subject to the pricing provisions of § 104 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, 15 U.S.C. § 3314. See 32 F.E.R.C. ¶161,122 (1985), Joint Appendix (“J.A.”) at 37-41. Section 104 applies to “natural gas committed or dedicated to interstate commerce on November 8, 1978.” 15 U.S.C. § 3314(a). Because we agree with the Commission that the gas at issue was committed or dedicated to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Interstate Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Texaco Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988