Legal Opinion
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Marlboro Cotton Mills
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 5, 1922No. 1970PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Charleston.
The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, one of the complainants, is a corporation of the state of Ohio, with its principal office at Akron, in that state, where it is engaged in the manufacture of automobile tires and accessories. It will be referred to as the Ohio company. *812Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, the other complainant, is a corporation of the state of West Virginia, and is wholly engaged in the business of selling automobile tires and accessories and does no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Barrow v. HuntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Public Service Co. of Northern Ill. v. CorboySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Jerry Wohl, Sometimes Known as Jerome S. Wohlmuth v. Roslyn Wohlmuth KeeneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.