Hooker, Corser & Mitchell Co. v. Hooker
New York Supreme Court
Action to charge certain real estate with payment of a judgment against defendant J ames F. Hooker.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, J.
This is an action to charge certain real estate in the city of Schenectady, paid for by James F. Hooker and deeded to Mande E. Hooker, his wife, with payment of a judgment recovered in January, 1916, by plaintiff against J ames F. Hooker. In *67and prior to May, 1909, James F. Hooker, the defendant, William H. Proctor, William H. Corser and Charles D. Whittaker were stockholders of the plaintiff, a Vermont corporation. In February, 1909, William H. Proctor brought an action againrJ the defendants here, William H. Corser and Charles D. Whit-taker and the Hooker, Corser & Mitchell Company, upon a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Wadleigh v. WadleighAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Dunlap v. . HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Guy v. CraigheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Brundage v. MungerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Primus v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Edie v. ColemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940
- Hale v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Hale v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955