City of New York v. Simmonds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to vacate the default judgment entered against them. The default cannot be considered "excusable” as required by CPLR 5015 (a) (1). Defendants were given a trial date and a five-month adjournment to obtain counsel. They were fully aware that they had to return to court on that date for trial, whether or not they had an attorney to represent them. The court’s directives were neither ambiguous nor confusing, as argued by defendants. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Moore v. ClaudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rottenberg v. LernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Simmons v. HappelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- ABBOTT, JONATHAN v. CROWN MILL RESTORATION DEVELOPMENTAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Abbott v. Crown Mill Restoration Development, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.