Legal Opinion

More v. Urbano

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 31, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In these appellate proceedings, instituted by the plaintiff, the trial court filed its finding on May 14, 1962. On May 25, 1962, no assignment of errors having been filed by the plaintiff as required by § 388 of the Practice Book, the defendant moved in this court to dismiss the appeal. See Practice Book § 436. On May 31, 1962, the plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of the time within which to file her assignment of errors. It is to be noted that this motion was filed after the period of ten days for filing her assignment of errors under § 388 of the Practice Book had expired. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Des ReisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  2. Schuhmacher v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Tamarit v. OttoliniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Walsh v. LaffenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Giordano Construction Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. State v. SteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Hodge v. ReinckeConnecticut Superior Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API