Legal Opinion · Dissent

South Dakota v. United States Department of the Interior

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1995No. 94-2344Published

1DissentMurphy, Circuit Judge

The court in this ease unnecessarily reaches a constitutional issue and bases its conclusions on speculation rather than the record. Its decision that a portion of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. § 465, is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power is not supported by the statute or its legislative history. The court invalidates today a congressional enactment designed to acquire land in trust for Indians that has been in place for over sixty years and, in the process, places in doubt the status of all Indian trust land. I must therefore dissent.

I

The primary focus of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API