Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Anzalone

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 29, 1995No. 94-5009; CMR No. 91 3214Published

1ConcurrenceWiss, Judge

(concurring.in the result):

27. I agree with the majority’s disposition of the certified issue — specifically, that the court below erred by holding that a perceived agreement between a servicemember and an undercover law enforcement agent to commit an offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice does not constitute an attempted conspiracy within the meaning of Article 80, UCMJ, 10 USC § 880. It is fully consistent with the approach this Court has *328followed in other contexts when an offense would have been completed if the circumstances actually had been as the accused had believed them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GarciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API