Bode Heinz v. Campolo

Opinion by

Keeler, J.,

This case is a sequel to the decision in Lucas v. Bode & Heinz, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 248. The plaintiffs, who were defendants in that case, were required to pay back to Mrs. Lucas an advance payment of $1,000 which she had made to them as agents for Campolo, the defendant herein, under an oral contract, made when shé signed the agreement for the purchase of Campolo’s real, estate, that they would pay it back to her unless Campolo executed and delivered the agreement. He never did, though he signed and tendered to her a different agreement containing a different description…