Crowley v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Chippewa 'county: A. J. Vinje, Circuit Judge. Action for compensation for personal injuries. This is the substance of the complaint: There is an ordinance of the city of Chippewa Palls, Wisconsin, prohibiting railway companies from, permitting any locomotive to stand or remain across any street or alley therein, except a sufficient time to couple and separate cars, not exceeding five minutes.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Chippewa 'county: A. J. Vinje, Circuit Judge. Action for compensation for personal injuries. This is the substance of the complaint: There is an ordinance of the city of Chippewa Palls, Wisconsin, prohibiting railway companies from, permitting any locomotive to stand or remain across any street or alley therein, except a sufficient time to couple and separate cars, not exceeding five minutes. December 15, 1902, defendant wilfully violated such ordinance by unnecessarily permitting one of its locomotives to remain on Canal street at its…
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.
While the argument of counsel for appellant extends to a somewhat broader field, it seems quite clear that the only actionable negligence claimed in the complaint or considered by the trial court upon the evidence is involved in these two propositions: (1) Did the defendant violate tlm ordinance of the city of Chippewa Falls providing that “no person shall stop or cause to be stopped any train of cars, car or engine across any street or alley of the city of Chippewa Falls, except a sufficient time to couple and separate cars, not exceeding five minutes” ? (2) "Did the respondent negligently…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cahoon v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Walters v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Dewey v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by5 opinions
- Depow v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Fay v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Look v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Salewski v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1920