Legal Opinion

Roger Owen Hooban v. Edward J. Boling

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1974No. 74-1159PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Roger Owen Hoo-ban, a law student at the University of Tennessee at the time the suit was filed, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that his classification by university officials as “out-of-state” for tuition purposes was “arbitrary, unreasonable and invidious” and, thus, a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and, further, that his classification has violated his right to travel. District Judge Robert L. Taylor, after hearing the ease without a jury, dismissed the action in an opinion reported…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Podgor v. Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Fagiano v. Police Board of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moreno v. University of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
  4. Peck v. University Residence CommitteeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Brown v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API