Legal Opinion
Toro Manufacturing Corporation v. Jacobsen Manufacturing Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 7, 1966No. 15309_1PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASTLE, Circuit Judge.
Jacobsen Manufacturing Company, defendant-appellant, prosecutes this appeal from the judgment order of the District Court entered against it in an action 1 brought by Toro Manufacturing Corporation, plaintiff-appellee, charging Jacobsen with infringement of Claims 1 through 4 and 8 through 12 of Toro’s Horner et al. U.S. Patent No. 2,973,614. 2 The District Court held the claims in suit valid and infringed by both of Jacob-sen’s accused devices. The court’s opinion, findings of fact and conclusions of law are reported as Toro Manufacturing Corp. v. Jacobsen Manufacturing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Akron Brass Company v. Elkhart Brass Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Simmons Company v. Hill-Rom CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Novo Industrial Corporation v. Standard Screw CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Panduit Corporation v. Burndy Corporation and Burndy Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Earl R. Ortman, D/B/A Advance Pump & Equipment Co. v. Herbert W. Maass, D/B/A Herb. Maass ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Skil Corporation v. Lucerne Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.