Lindeman v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Judge.
Both parties appeal from rulings on Christopher Lindeman's application for post-conviction relief from his conviction for second-degree murder. The State argues that Superior Court Judge Patrick J. McKay failed to make sufficient findings to justify the con-elusion that Lindeman received ineffective assistance from the attorney who handled the appeal from Lindeman's conviction. We conclude that the court made sufficient findings on this issue, and that there is a reasonable possibility that Lindeman would have prevailed on appeal if he had attacked the jury instruction on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- Page v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
- Gregory Marino v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
- Israel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.