Legal Opinion

Lindeman v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 7, 2011No. A-10254, A-10283PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOLGER, Judge.

Both parties appeal from rulings on Christopher Lindeman's application for post-conviction relief from his conviction for second-degree murder. The State argues that Superior Court Judge Patrick J. McKay failed to make sufficient findings to justify the con-elusion that Lindeman received ineffective assistance from the attorney who handled the appeal from Lindeman's conviction. We conclude that the court made sufficient findings on this issue, and that there is a reasonable possibility that Lindeman would have prevailed on appeal if he had attacked the jury instruction on…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  5. Page v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
  3. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011
  4. Gregory Marino v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
  5. Israel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API