Legal Opinion
Doe v. Doe
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1996No. 21833PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
By this appeal we are asked to determine whether an order that disposes of only one action among three related actions that have been consolidated in the trial court constitutes a final judgment in the absence of an I.R.C.P. 54(b) certification. We hold that it does not. Accordingly, we conclude that a memorandum of costs and fees filed more than fourteen days after such an order, but before entry of the judgment that fully resolved the remaining issues in the consolidated cases, was not untimely under I.R.C.P. 54(d)(5).
BACKGROUND
Appellant John Doe I is the natural father of a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Donald R. Huene and Annette S. Huene v. United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Harrison v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Massachusetts Helicopter Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Raymond F. Ringwald, Sr. v. R. D. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.