Legal Opinion
Stuckey v. Provident Bank
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 2005No. 2003-CA-02003-SCTPublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
912 So.2d 859 (2005)
Isaac STUCKEY and Karen Stuckey
v.
THE PROVIDENT BANK.
No. 2003-CA-02003-SCT.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
March 17, 2005.
R. Charles Robb, attorney for appellants.
Richard Scott Pietrowski, attorney for appellee.
EN BANC.
CARLSON, Justice, for the Court.
¶ 1. Isaac and Karen Stuckey ("the Stuckeys"), husband and wife, appeal to this Court from a final judgment of dismissal entered by the Chancery Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County. The Stuckeys assert that the chancery court failed to consider both the substantive and evidentiary value of the allegations stated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brown v. Credit Center, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Short v. Columbus Rubber and Gasket Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Union Planters National Leasing, Inc. v. Roderick D. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Shaw v. BurchfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
- Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Price v. Purdue Pharma Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Moss v. Batesville Casket Co., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Buckel v. ChaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
- Wilner v. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Williams v. BennettMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.