Legal Opinion · Dissent

Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Richie

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1998No. 12A05-9711-CV-467Published

1DissentBailey, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Indiana Code § 29-l-14-l(f) does not apply to bar Richie’s lawsuit to the extént he seeks to realize upon any casualty insurance proceeds available to indemnify against decedent’s negligence, and does not seek to affect any interest in the assets of the estate. As noted in the majority, the relevant portion of the non-claims statute reads as follows:

Nothing in this section shall affect or prevent the enforcement of a claim for injury to person or damage to property arising out of negligence against the estate of a deceased tort feasor within the period of the statute…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slater v. StoffelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Clark v. Estate of SlavensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Pasley v. American Underwriters, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Serban v. HalseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API