Legal Opinion

County of Norfolk v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 20, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The judge did not err in allowing the defendant Schiffer’s motion for summary judgment and later dismissing the action against all the defendants, based upon the uncontested affidavit of the town clerk stating that only telephone notice from the plaintiff (an abutting landowner) expressing an intent to appeal the board’s decision was received by his office within the twenty-day period specified in G. L. c. 40A, § 17, first par., as amended by St. 1978, c. 478, § 32. Section 17 provides, in pertinent part, that “[a]ny person aggrieved by a decision of the board of appeals . . . may appeal ...…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Board of Appeals of CarverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Costello v. Board of Appeals of LexingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. McLaughlin v. Rockland Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Carey v. Planning Board of RevereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  5. Carr v. Board of Appeals of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Konover Management Corp. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  2. Town of Uxbridge v. GriffMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Brattman v. Secretary of the CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  4. Mason v. Old King's Highway Regional Historic District CommissionMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
  5. Barry v. ConsolatiMassachusetts Land Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API