Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 171, Calendar No. 36,271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Defendant, charged with procuring a female inmate for a house of prostitution (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 16862), was convicted and sentenced, and has appealed.

The evidence is that the female came to defendant’s house and was taken in by defendant and there remained.

The word procure, as used in the statute, means to acquire or to get. The female here was procured or acquired or gotten within the meaning of the statute. To show the procuring the female as an “inmate for a house of prostitution,” evidence was properly received of arrest and conviction of a prostitute from the house (50 C. J. p. 813),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. People v. LintzMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hickey v. HinsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Saunders v. Tioga Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. MastenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. MastenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API