Legal Opinion

Slocumb v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1991No. 82A01-9010-CR-414PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Jeffrey A. Slocumb appeals his convietion for Theft 1 , a Class D felony, and his enhanced sentence as an habitual offender. We affirm his conviction but reverse the habitual offender finding and remand for the court to vacate the habitual offender enhancement of the sentence.

ISSUES

Slocumb raises seven issues on appeal which we consolidate and restate as:

1. Did the trial court err in denying Slocumb's counsel's motion to withdraw on the day of trial?

2. Did the trial court err by proceeding to trial and sentencing Slocumb in absen-tig?

3. ' Were the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Huffman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Conn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Slocumb v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. McCaffrey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Gillespie v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API