Legal Opinion

Amara v. Boeing

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided April 11, 2024No. 4:22-cv-01054Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION AYMAN AMARA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:22-CV-1054 RLW ) BOEING, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER This closed matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se Motion to Extend Right to Sue Boeing Due to Medical Conditions. (ECF No. 16). The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as one for relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 The Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion. On October 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed this employment discrimination action against his former employer Boeing. (ECF No. 1). In an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Patricia Freeman v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. James W. Chambers v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API