Legal Opinion

Michigan Battery Equipment Inc v. Emcasco Insurance Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2016No. Docket 326945PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

In this insurance coverage dispute, plaintiff, Michigan Battery Equipment, Inc. (Michigan Battery), appeals the trial court’s order that granted summary disposition in favor of defendant, EMCASCO Insurance Company (EMC). The trial court granted summary disposition because it held that the loss was caused by wet rot, which was a risk not covered but instead was specifically excluded from coverage under the policy. For the reasons provided below, we affirm.

I. BRIEF FACTS AND GENERAL PRINCIPLES REGARDING INSURANCE CONTRACTS

Due to prolonged water infiltration through deteriorated rubber grommets…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. ChurchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY v. CITY OF WARRENDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  2. Abundant Faith Cathedral v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  3. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Co. v. J Hohman LLC d/b/a Lagarda Security & Cannon Security, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
  4. Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Thomas Kaeding IIMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Cox III LLC v. Farmers Insurance Company IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API