Legal Opinion

Theodore J. Molzahn & Sons, Inc. v. K. W. Construction Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The subcontractor, in its contract with the principal contractor, agreed “to furnish and pay for all costs or rentals of equipment . . . required for the construction . . .’’of the work to be performed by the subcontractor, and also agreed to “furnish a surety company bond guarantying the full, complete, and faithful performance of this agreement. . . .” By those provisions the subcontractor expressly obligated itself (1) to “pay for all rentals of equipment required for the construction of the subcontract work,” and (2) to furnish a surety bond guarantying “the full, complete performance of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. GleasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Builders Lumber & Supply Co. v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. R. Connor Co. v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Concrete Steel Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knuth v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API