Legal Opinion

Leymis V. v. Whitaker

District Court, D. Maine

Decided November 21, 2018No. Case No. 18-cv-00733 (JNE/SER)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOAN N. ERICKSEN, United States District Judge

This case involves the interplay between two subsections of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"): the designation of Temporary Protected Status ("TPS") under § 1254a and the adjustment of status to Lawful Permanent Resident ("LPR") under § 1255. The sole issue before the Court is whether TPS beneficiaries are deemed "inspected and admitted" to satisfy the threshold requirement for adjustment of status. The Court holds that they are.

BACKGROUND

Two statutory provisions are at the heart of this case. The first provision, § 1254a, authorizes the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melgar v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  2. Bhujel v. NielsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  3. Hernandez de Gutierrez v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  4. Hernandez de Gutierrez v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  5. Melgar v. BarrDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API