Legal Opinion

Richards v. Carl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1824PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Richards and Carl covenanted with each other As follows: Richards was to furnish Carl with oné-third of a boat, and to deliver to him in said boat 2,000 lbs. of pork, and 2,000 lbs. of beef more or less, 15 dozen chickens, 100 dozen candles more or less, 10 bushels of corn, one-tliird of a barrel of whiskey, and the remainder in staves, to complete one-third of the load of said Boat. In consideration of which, Carl covenanted to pay him 200 dollars at a future day. For the performance of these covenants, they bound themselves to each other.in the sum of 400 dollars. On this obligation,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gracie v. New-York InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1811

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API