Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Barnes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 1, 2015No. Appellate Case 2014-001966; 27538Published

1DissentChief Justice Toal

I respectfully dissent. I would find that Respondent waived his right to insist on counsel by arguing and obtaining a ruling that he was deprived of his right to represent himself in his first trial. In my opinion, such waiver should be assessed on a case-by-case basis; however, the facts of this case warrant a finding of waiver.

*8Here, Respondent has already received a full and fair trial. However, in his initial trial, Respondent took the position that he desired to represent himself. Pursuant to Indiana v. Edwards,4, the trial judge decided that Respondent was not capable of representing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API