Legal Opinion
Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 26, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin’s majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 131 N.J.Super. 139, 618 A.2d 352 (1992).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — None.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tp. of Cherry Hill v. Nj Racing Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Rugala v. NJ INS. UNDERWRITINGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- America's Dream Homes, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Okosa v. HallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998