Legal Opinion

State v. Kirkling

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 2005No. 2004-KA-1906PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.

In this criminal case, the sole issue the defendant, Michael Kirkling, raises is the excessiveness of the concurrent twenty-year maximum sentences imposed on him for count one (attempted carjacking as a second felony offender) and count two (purse snatching). For the reasons that follow, we affirm his convictions, adjudication as a second offender, and sentence as to count two, but vacate his sentence as to count one and remand for re-sentencing.

STATEMENT OF CASE

On September 9, 2002, the State filed a bill of information charging Mr. Kirkling with attempted carjacking, a violation of La. R.S.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  2. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. State v. QuebedeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. State v. CastonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. State v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RandallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. State v. RideauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. State v. RandallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. State v. ColvinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. State of Louisiana v. Aaron K. MitchellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API