Chambers v. Gough

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON DENIAL OF REHEARING

The plaintiff has filed a petition for rehearing stating that the court has overlooked or misapprehended a portion of the evidence. It is true that the statement of this court that the plaintiff “knew of this discrepancy between the occupancy and monument lines and the plat of survey at the time he purchased the property” is incorrect. The record does not disclose this specifically but the plaintiff in fact knew of the discrepancy prior to the time he occupied the property. This does not alter our decision.

The plaintiff further contends that had the…