Legal Opinion

Muir v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 8, 1985No. 124, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C.J.

“Ambiguity in statutes may not be the parent of litigation, but it is certainly a kissing cousin.” 1

The late Judge John P. Moore, writing for this Court in Calhoun v. State, 46 Md.App. 478, 418 A.2d 1241 (1980), aff'd, 290 Md. 1, 425 A.2d 1361 (1981), characterized the “draftsmanship” of Md.Ann.Code art. 27, § 643B(c) as “patently inartful.” “Any change,” he wrote, “must be left to the legislature.” Calhoun, 46 Md.App. at 490, 418 A.2d at 1249, aff'd 290 Md. 1, 425 A.2d 1361. That body heeded Judge Moore’s implicit invitation, but it, nevertheless, failed to clarify completely § 643B(c). As a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Brown v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Calhoun v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. State v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Muir v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Hall v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. ConnorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API