Legal Opinion

Horsted v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 2, 1996No. 95-2734Published

1Per curiam

AFFIRMED. § 947.18, Fla.Stat. (1993); Rule 23-21.001, et seq., Fla.Admin.Code (rules implementing statutory guidelines for Commission’s responsibilities); Dugger v. Grant, 610 So.2d 428, 432 (Fla.1992) (“only a modicum of evidence is necessary to support an administrative decision regarding inmates even when such a decision does involve due process rights”); Parole & Probation Commission v. Bruce, 471 So.2d 7 (Fla.1985); Florida Parole & Probation Commission v. Paige, 462 So.2d 817, 819-20 (Fla.1985) (Commission has ultimate discretion in deciding whether to parole); McCorvey v..Florida…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dugger v. GrantSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N v. PaigeSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. May v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N v. BruceSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. McCorvey v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API