Horsted v. Florida Parole Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
AFFIRMED. § 947.18, Fla.Stat. (1993); Rule 23-21.001, et seq., Fla.Admin.Code (rules implementing statutory guidelines for Commission’s responsibilities); Dugger v. Grant, 610 So.2d 428, 432 (Fla.1992) (“only a modicum of evidence is necessary to support an administrative decision regarding inmates even when such a decision does involve due process rights”); Parole & Probation Commission v. Bruce, 471 So.2d 7 (Fla.1985); Florida Parole & Probation Commission v. Paige, 462 So.2d 817, 819-20 (Fla.1985) (Commission has ultimate discretion in deciding whether to parole); McCorvey v..Florida…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dugger v. GrantSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N v. PaigeSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- May v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'NSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N v. BruceSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- McCorvey v. Florida Parole CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.