Legal Opinion

Pickard v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 1910No. 2223PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action, for malicious prosecution; from city court of Oglethorpe —Judge Greer. September 14, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

In a petition to recover damages for malicious prosecution, it was alleged, that the plaintiff was arrested on a warrant sworn out by the defendant, charging him with the offense of cheating and swindling, and was taken before a magistrate, who, after an investigation, dismissed the warrant and discharged him. By amendment it was alleged that since the dismissal of the warrant and the discharge of the plaintiff, and before the filing of the suit for malicious prosecution, a term1 of the superior court of the county, with a grand jury empanelled, had convened and adjourned, without any further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Page v. Citizens Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hartshorn v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Woodruff v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Price v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Bailey v. General Apartment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Sykes v. South Side Atlanta BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Godfrey v. Home Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Garrett v. Foy & Adams Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API