Van Brunt & Co. v. Mather
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Winneshiek District Court, Action at law upon a promissory note executed by a firm, of which defendants were copartners. There was a judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Green appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
1. pleading action I. The original petition declared upon a promissory note executed by E. Mather & Co., and averred that defendants, as copartners, constituted that firm. An amendment to the petition, called an additional petition, was subsequently filed, alleging that defendants were copartners, and as such received from plaintiffs certain agricultural implements for sale; that the property was sold by defendants and promissory notes taken *504in payment, which were left by plaintiffs with the firm for collection, and were by the firm collected, and that thereafter plaintiffs and the firm had a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pearson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kimball v. BryanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
- Sadler v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Munn v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1890