Legal Opinion
Town of Myrtle Beach v. Holliday, Tax Col.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 7, 1943No. 15549PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Associate Justice Baker
delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court :
By permission this action was instituted in the original jurisdiction of this Court.
The agreed statement of facts and the respective positions of plaintiff and defendant are:
“1. F. G. Holliday is Tax Collector for Horry County; Myrtle Beach is a South Carolina municipal corporation situate in Horry County, and W. G. Query, J. P. Derham and Francis M. Pinckney are members of and constitute the South Carolina Tax Commission, which commission has authority to abate the taxes which are subj ect to this action.
“2. On'May…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Gachet v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- State v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charleston County Aviation Authority v. WassonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- United States v. Clover Spinning Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. State of ScSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Hampton Friends of Arts v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Hock RH, LLC v. S.C. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.