Legal Opinion

Rusconi v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 28, 1947No. 7046-WMPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

This cause having heretofore come before the court for hearing on motion of Employers’ Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, a corporation, and Westchester Fire Insurance Company, a corporation, for leave to intervene as parties plaintiff, and the motion having been heard and submitted for decision, and it appearing to the court that the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 931, does not expressly grant consent to suit by the subrogee of a claimant, See 31 U.S.C.A. § 203, and that consent of the Government to be sued,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Wie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
  2. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Grace Ex Rel. Grangers Mut. Ins. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1948
  4. Wojciuk v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947
  5. Newsum v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API