Legal Opinion

Bauman v. McManus

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 15,891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Harvey district court; Peter J. Galle, judge. STATEMENT. J. P. Bauman & Sons, a partnership, are wholesale merchants doing business in New York City. McManus Brothers, also á partnership, are merchants doing business at Newton, Kan.

Read the full summary

Error from Harvey district court; Peter J. Galle, judge. STATEMENT. J. P. Bauman & Sons, a partnership, are wholesale merchants doing business in New York City. McManus Brothers, also á partnership, are merchants doing business at Newton, Kan. Oh November 12, 1903, a traveling salesman of Bauman & Sons called upon McManus Brothers at their place of business and received an order from them for a bill of goods, amounting to the sum of $354.64. The order was to be filled and shipped March-1, 1904. The purchaser reserved the right to change or cancel the order, but no time for the exercise of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

It is insisted by the plaintiffs that, Mc-Manus Brothers having reserved the right to cancel the order and no time having been fixed by the contract within which this right should be exercised, they were bound to do so within a reasonable time. It is further urged that what constitutes a reasonable time in this case is a question of,law, and the court committed material error by submitting it to the jury.

It seems to be conceded that this is a question of law when the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction are undisputed. But…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ziegelmeier v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API