Legal Opinion

Miller v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 3, 1940No. 14,778PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Otto Bock

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, in which two minors, through their mother, seek an award as dependents of their deceased father, Francis Miller, an employee of defendant in error The New England Cafeteria. The Industrial Commission denied benefits, holding that the claim was barred by section 363, chapter 97, ’35 C.S.A., the pertinent part of which is as follows: “The right to compensation and benefits, as provided in this article, shall be barred unless within six months after the injury, or within one year after death resulting therefrom, a notice claiming…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Evanoff v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Moreno v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rosane v. SengerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Lametta v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Lacholia v. Texas Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Industrial Commission v. RoweSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Ball v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API