Legal Opinion

Lassiter v. Kaufman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 27, 1990No. 88-2467PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

We grant appellant’s amended motion for rehearing and clarification, and substitute the following opinion for the majority view of our original opinion:

AFFIRMED on the authority of Palm Pavilion of Clearwater, Inc. v. Thompson, 458 So.2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). See also the dissent in Contos v. Lipsky, 433 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). Because we recognize a possible conflict with the Contos majority, we certify the following question to the supreme court:

IN THE DETERMINATION OF FAIR MARKET VALUE OF LEASED PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF THE EXERCISE OF A LESSEE’S OPTION TO PURCHASE, MAY…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Contos v. LipskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Palm Pavilion of Clearwater v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Kaufman v. LassiterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Freundlich v. LassiterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API