Legal Opinion

Milner Coal & Railroad v. Wiggins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from tlie Birmingham City Court. Tried .before the Hon. W. M. Wili-cerson. No statement of the facts is deemed necessary.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, C. J.

One assignment of error is in the following words: “The court erred in giving each of the charges in writing requested by plaintiff and given by the court, and each of said charges are herewith assigned separately as error.” Another is this : “The court erred in refusing each of the charges in writing requested by the defendant and refused' by the court, and herewith assigns separately the refusal of each of said charges.” Without considering whether these assignments of error Avould be sufficient to present the railings of the court on these requests for instructions for review, if these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. Nuckols v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McPherson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. Kendall & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Bank of Tallassee v. Elmore Fertilizer Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Hopkins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API