Legal Opinion

Ruttencutter v. Ruttencutter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 12, 1943PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

The sole issue in this case imposes upon us the unpleasant task of determining who is entitled to the custody of a boy child some seven or eight years old at the time of the trial, at which the court adjudged in favor of appellee, the mother, and from which appellant, the father, has appealed. We say the task is unpleasant, because whichever way it may be discharged our judgment possesses the potentialities of affecting the child’s career for good or bad throughout its life. Hence, it is both delicate and far-reaching but which we encounter much…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wacker v. WackerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Sowders v. SowdersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Altemeier v. RachfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Ridgeway v. WalterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. De Long v. De LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of JennerjohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Hager v. HagerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  4. Harp v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
  5. Harp v. HarpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API