Legal Opinion
United States v. Spight
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 6, 2017No. Criminal No. 13-254 (DWF/TNL)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the- Court upon Defendant Jamillo Donte Spight’s motion for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(b)(1). (Doc. No. 130.) The Defendant moved for a new trial based on the discovery of purportedly new evidence. The United States (“the Government”) opposed the Defendant’s motion in all respects. (Doc. No. 131.) For the reasons outlined below, the Court denies Defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
A grand jury indicted, the Defendant for being an Armed Career Criminal in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Raydell Lacey, Also Known as Lacey, Also Known as Camile, Also Known as Raydell Laye Lacey, Also Known as Raydell F. LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America v. Nathan Benedict Dogskin, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Fabian A. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jamillo Donte SpightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.