Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Leavitt

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 26, 1996No. 96-1150, 96-1151PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

The parents of Archie Elliott III brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that police officers Jason Leavitt and Wayne Cheney used excessive force in the course of arresting Elliott for driving while intoxicated. The district court denied the officers’ motion for summary judgment, and the officers filed this appeal challenging the court’s refusal to grant them qualified immunity. We reverse the judgment of the district court, finding that the officers’ use of deadly force in response to an obvious, serious, and immediate threat to their safety was reasonable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Norman Slattery v. Christopher RizzoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. Henry v. PurnellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  2. Lamont v. New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. George Cooper, Sr. v. James SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. Wilkinson v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Waterman v. BattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API