Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. Kopani

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1987No. 75A03-8603-CV-68Published

1DissentConover, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the majority as to Missimi, Burge, and Kopani. However, I respectfully dissent as to the majority's holding regarding Kordos for the reasons stated in my dissent in Romack v. Public Service Co. of Indiana (1986), Ind.App., 499 N.E.2d 768, trans. granted, dissent adopted in part, 511 N.E.2d 1024.

The following facts here regarding Kor-dos parallel those in Romack:

*849(a) Kordos was uniquely qualified for the specialized position Whiteco sought to fill, namely, theatrical producer, by virtue of his talent, education, training, and experience;(b) Kordos did not seek…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Romack v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Romack v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Frederick Bros. Artists Corp. v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API