Legal Opinion
Hale v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 30, 2017No. Case No. 3:15–cv–360PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge
This Social Security disability benefits appeal is before the undersigned for disposition based upon the parties' full consent. Doc. 7. At issue is whether the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") erred in finding Plaintiff not "disabled" and therefore unentitled to Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") and/or Supplemental Security Income ("SSI").1 This case is before the *789Court on Plaintiff's Statement of Errors (doc. 8), the Commissioner's memorandum in opposition (doc. 10), Plaintiff's reply (doc. 11), the administrative record (doc. 5, 6),2 and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- David Bowen v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Masters v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Christy R. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
- Cyrus v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Davis v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Latonya J. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.