Stovall of Chattanooga, Inc. v. Cunningham
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
CRAWFORD, Judge.
This is essentially a suit on a guaranty agreement. Plaintiff, Stovall of Chattanooga, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff or Stovall), appeals from the judgment of the trial court on a jury verdict for defendant, Robert B. Cunningham 1 (hereinafter referred to as defendant or Cunningham). The first issue for review is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict made at the conclusion of all of the proof.
In 1988 and prior thereto, Cunningham operated a sole proprietorship business known as Tri-State Engine Service. On May 31, 1988,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baird v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Koontz v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
- Wilson Management Co. v. Star Distributors Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Gitter v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- Webb v. Board of Trustees of Webb SchoolCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jenkins Subway, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Productive MD, LLC v. Aetna Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Kentucky National Insurance Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Tarpley v. HornyakCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Bacardi v. Tennessee Board of Registration in PodiatryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.