Legal Opinion

Stovall of Chattanooga, Inc. v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 16, 1994No. C.A. 03A01-9401-CV-00028PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge.

This is essentially a suit on a guaranty agreement. Plaintiff, Stovall of Chattanooga, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff or Stovall), appeals from the judgment of the trial court on a jury verdict for defendant, Robert B. Cunningham 1 (hereinafter referred to as defendant or Cunningham). The first issue for review is whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict made at the conclusion of all of the proof.

In 1988 and prior thereto, Cunningham operated a sole proprietorship business known as Tri-State Engine Service. On May 31, 1988,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baird v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Koontz v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  3. Wilson Management Co. v. Star Distributors Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gitter v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  5. Webb v. Board of Trustees of Webb SchoolCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jenkins Subway, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Productive MD, LLC v. Aetna Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
  3. Kentucky National Insurance Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Tarpley v. HornyakCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Bacardi v. Tennessee Board of Registration in PodiatryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API