Mizell v. . Bazemore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOB, J.
In Harris v. Distributing Co., 172 N. C., 14, it is said: “It has been held in this State that an action cannot be maintained to restrain the sale of land under execution upon the ground that the sale and deed made pursuant thereto will be a cloud on the title of the plaintiff (McLean v. Shaw, 125 N. C., 491), but this has been changed by statute (Crockett v. Bray, 151 N. C., 615), and a plaintiff can, under the law as it now exists, restrain a sale under execution if the deed of the officer who sells will not pass title, and will only throw a cloud upon the title of the plaintiff.” C. S.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dick v. . PitchfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Crockett v. . BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Mebane v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845
- Harris v. Carolina Distributing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Pace v. . Pace, Adm'r., C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Exum v. Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- In Re the Estate of BulisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Holden v. . TottenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945