Textron, Inc. v. Froelich
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
The appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting a compulsory nonsuit as to his contractual counterclaim. The existence of a contract in this case depends on (1) whether the oral offer here necessarily terminated at the end of a telephone conversation, or, (2) if it did, whether there was a counteroffer made and accepted.
The facts as set forth in the appellant’s case are as follows: The appellee, a fabricator of steel and wire products, orally offered the appellant, a steel broker, a specified quantity of two different sizes of steel rods at specified…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boyd v. Merchants & Farmers Peanut Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'FARRELL v. Steel City Piping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Zaniecki v. P. A. Bergner & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Vaskie v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Yaros v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Republic Bank, Inc. v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.