Legal Opinion

Textron, Inc. v. Froelich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1973No. Appeal, 249PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting a compulsory nonsuit as to his contractual counterclaim. The existence of a contract in this case depends on (1) whether the oral offer here necessarily terminated at the end of a telephone conversation, or, (2) if it did, whether there was a counteroffer made and accepted.

The facts as set forth in the appellant’s case are as follows: The appellee, a fabricator of steel and wire products, orally offered the appellant, a steel broker, a specified quantity of two different sizes of steel rods at specified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boyd v. Merchants & Farmers Peanut Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'FARRELL v. Steel City Piping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Zaniecki v. P. A. Bergner & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Vaskie v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Yaros v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Republic Bank, Inc. v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API