Legal Opinion

State v. Bey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 13, 2026No. 127537Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,537 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AHMAD K. BEY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Hearsay is generally inadmissible unless an exception identified in K.S.A. 60-460 applies. One such exception is the "necessity exception" in K.S.A. 60-460(d)(3). It applies when the district court finds that (1) the declarant is unavailable; (2) the declarant made the statement at a time when the matter had been recently perceived by the declarant and while the declarant's recollection was clear; and (3) the declarant made the statement in good faith prior…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Lord v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. DukesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  5. State v. LowerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API