Legal Opinion

In re Woodin

New York County Courts

Decided August 27, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOttaway, J.

The facts in this case are not seriously in dispute. It appears that William Seeley, ancestor of the respondents, was a member of the Seneca Nation of Indians. Whatever may have been his tribal ancestry at least he was recognized and enrolled in the Seneca Nation. He settled upon the land in question, which is real estate consisting of a, small farm within the limits of the Cattaraugus reservation and located in the county of Chautauqua. He improved this farm and lived upon it during his lifetime. In the year 1894 he died and his surviving son, Jasper Seeley, continued to make this farm his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Council of the Seneca NationNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Hatch v. LuckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Seneca Nation of Indians v. LehleyNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. City of SalamancaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1939
  2. Andrews v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  3. In re FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. Bennett v. Fink Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Spota v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API